(No Ratings Yet)
Loading ...Week 9. Status Report
The Survey Results Report for the NetHope – University of Waterloo MMSc Online Project Management Survey was further analyzed throughout the week as an inconsistency was noted during final peer review. This required a thorough re-assessment of the analysis, and required some graph changes and further peer review of the results is to be done this weekend. The importance of this was paramount, given the importance of the conclusions resulting from the Survey.
The pressure is now on completing the assessments on potential areas of improvement and focusing on drafting the final report, which is due at the end of the following week.
Add to: del.icio.us | Digg IT | Furl | Google | magnolia | StumbleIT | Wink | Yahoo! Technorati
(1 votes, average: 9 out of 10) Loading ...Week 8. Status Report
The Survey Results Report for the NetHope – University of Waterloo MMSc Online Project Management Survey, was completed this week. Of the 16 Member Organizations responding, the following are some key observations:
• Project management skills overall showed as an area in need of improvement.
• Post project lessons learned reviews is an area for improvement (key for corporate knowledge and highlighting areas in need of improvement).
• While Agile PM methodologies are not used much today, there appears to be a good opportunity to benefit from an Agile (light) approach.
In addition, of the 16 Member Organizations responding to the survey, 11 provided contacts for follow up interviews, of which 7 were completed this week. For time reasons, further interviews are unlikely, though the information we have received has been very good. The weekend will focus on building a catalogue of current NHMO “best practices”, and starting an analysis compared against industry “best practices” within key focus areas.
